Current condition
Example: “The evidence does not show a current diagnosed disability.”
VA may be saying that the record did not establish a current condition, or that the evidence did not clearly identify the claimed condition.
Questions to review
- Was a diagnosis or current condition documented?
- Were relevant medical records missing?
- Did VA discuss the symptoms and medical findings that were submitted?
In-service event
Example: “The evidence does not show an event, disease, or injury in service.”
VA may have accepted the current condition but found insufficient evidence of what happened during service.
Questions to review
- Did VA review the relevant service treatment or personnel records?
- Are deployment, unit, incident, exposure, or training records relevant?
- Could a competent personal statement or buddy statement help document what happened?
Connection to service
Example: “The evidence does not establish a link between your condition and military service.”
VA may have accepted both a current condition and an in-service event but found the evidence linking them insufficient or less persuasive than other evidence.
Questions to review
- Was there a C&P medical opinion?
- Did the examiner discuss the relevant history?
- Did VA address supportive medical opinions or treatment records?
- Did the decision explain why one opinion was given more weight?
Secondary service connection
Example: “The evidence does not show that the claimed condition was caused or aggravated by a service-connected condition.”
A secondary claim involves a new condition linked to a disability VA has already determined is service connected. The evidence requirements differ from a direct-service-connection claim.
Official VA evidence requirements ↗
Rating or severity
Example: “The evidence does not support a higher evaluation.”
This may mean VA granted service connection but found that the documented symptoms or functional impairment did not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
Questions to review
- Which rating criteria did VA apply?
- Did VA discuss the relevant DBQ or examination findings?
- Did the decision address frequency, severity, duration, limitations, and functional impact?
If an already service-connected condition has simply worsened, VA generally treats that as an increased-rating claim rather than a Supplemental Claim based only on worsening.
VA Supplemental Claims guidance ↗
New and relevant evidence
Example: “New and relevant evidence has not been received.”
This wording may appear when VA determines that evidence submitted with a Supplemental Claim was not both new and relevant to the issue.
New: information VA did not previously consider.
Relevant: information that proves or disproves something in the claim.
VA Supplemental Claims guidance ↗